Swift Reckoning PIO

Other printings of "Swift Reckoning": ORI #35 PIO #39 UMA #39

Card

id	67469
artist	Chris Rahn
artistIds	7742047e-0f80-4c0f-a530-d07460165e86
asciiName
attractionLights
availability	arena
boosterTypes
borderColor	black
colorIdentity	W
colorIndicator
colors	W
defense
duelDeck
edhrecRank	24354
edhrecSaltiness	0.29
faceConvertedManaCost
faceFlavorName
faceManaValue
faceName
finishes	nonfoil
flavorName
flavorText
frameEffects
frameVersion	2015
hand
hasAlternativeDeckLimit
hasContentWarning
hasFoil	0
hasNonFoil	1
isAlternative
isFullArt
isFunny
isGameChanger
isOnlineOnly	1
isOversized
isPromo
isRebalanced
isReprint	1
isReserved
isStarter	1
isStorySpotlight
isTextless
isTimeshifted
keywords	Spell mastery
language	English
layout	normal
leadershipSkills
life
loyalty
manaCost	{1}{W}
manaValue	2
name	Swift Reckoning
number	39
originalPrintings
originalReleaseDate
originalText
otherFaceIds
power
printings	ORI, PIO, UMA
promoTypes
rarity	common
rebalancedPrintings
relatedCards
securityStamp
setCode	PIO
side
signature
sourceProducts
subsets
subtypes
supertypes
text	Spell mastery — If there are two or more instant and/or sorcery cards in your graveyard, you may cast this spell as though it had flash. (You may cast it any time you could cast an instant.) Destroy target tapped creature.
toughness
type	Sorcery
types	Sorcery
uuid	3225eabe-fca3-5213-882e-72c7b5882be4
variations
watermark
setName	Pioneer Masters

No foreign data.

date	text
2015-06-22	Check to see if there are two or more instant and/or sorcery cards in your graveyard as the spell resolves to determine whether the spell mastery ability applies. The spell itself won't count because it's still on the stack as you make this check.
2018-12-07	If an effect allows you to cast Swift Reckoning from your graveyard, you need two other instant and/or sorcery cards in your graveyard to cast it as though it had flash.
2018-12-07	The number of instant and/or sorcery cards in your graveyard matters only as you begin to cast Swift Reckoning. Once it's cast, that number doesn't matter and will have no effect on Swift Reckoning resolving.